Product · AI redlining

Not just the flag: the replacement language.

A marked-up Word document with real tracked changes, drafted against your playbook and ready for a reviewer to edit and send.

Flagging a problem is the easy half.

What takes a lawyer's afternoon are the mechanics of addressing the problem: crafting or finding the right language, confirming it against policy, and shuttling the document into the right places.

Real tracked changes, not a viewer

an ordinary DOCX, nothing to learn
01

It opens where you already work

Word, Word Online, Google Docs or Pages. Accept, reject, edit, comment, exactly as a marked-up contract should behave.

02

The reviewer stays in charge

Nothing stops a reviewer rewriting a suggestion before it goes out. They are accountable for what gets sent, so they must be able to change it.

03

Every edit is attributed

AeroSpark authorship is attributed and can be configured independently for internally and externally facing documents.

The concerns on the review card are always the complete picture. The marked-up document is a best-effort application of them; a clause inside a table or unusual formatting may be raised without a tracked change attached.

Your standards, not generic ones

It argues from your playbook

Suggestions are grounded in the standards you configured: your positions, your fallbacks, your red lines. Upload a written negotiation playbook and AeroSpark turns it into the policy the redlines argue from.

Standard position Fallback Red line
Round two and three

It remembers the negotiation

AeroSpark reconciles what you asked for last time against what came back: accepted, rejected, or still open. Where the counterparty rejected an ask, it leaves the clause and a note saying so.

No silent conceding, no silent re-asking. That decision goes to a human.

Common questions

Yes. The output is an ordinary DOCX with native tracked changes, attributed to AeroSpark AI. It opens in Word, Word Online, Google Docs or Pages and behaves like any other marked-up contract.

Yes, and that is the point: the reviewer is accountable for what goes out, so nothing stops them rewriting or rejecting a suggestion first. There is no proprietary viewer in the way.

It works on the document as it arrives, preserving the changes the counterparty already made, and adds its own on top.